4 ms·
This seems to be where they explain it: "Even though Librem Tunnel is just part of the overall Librem One offering, because it’s part of a subscription service
by kop316 6y ago
This seems to be where they explain it:
"Even though Librem Tunnel is just part of the overall Librem One offering, because it’s part of a subscription service, Apple is requiring us to add the ability to sign up and pay for Librem One subscriptions within the Librem Tunnel app before they will allow updated versions into the App Store."
However, what you show seems to contradict that?
EDIT: If I were to guess, the flagging was an automated process, i.e. Apple flagged it and sent an automated email to Purism. Whether or not Purism tried to respond or not I do not know, but in the end they decided not to deal with it and pulled their app.
- TedDoesntTalk 6y agomy company had the exact same problem. This is no automated process. We had to enable EITHER in-app free trials OR in-app purchases (or both). And you cant use stripe, paypal, amazon payments, google pay, or alipay in-app.... it MUST be apple pay.
- mullingitover 6y agoDid they cite the particular part of the developer agreement that was violated in your case?
- TedDoesntTalk 6y agoYes, but I don't have it handy to quote to you. By the way, the forced use of Apple Pay is the really big anticompetitive behavior -- bigger than the forced use of the Apple App Store.
- kop316 6y agoThanks for the clarification!