3 ms·
You are completely right. The X61s is a better design (I happen to own one too!), I completely forgot about it as, due to its much slower CPU, I must have put i
by astorgard 6y ago
You are completely right. The X61s is a better design (I happen to own one too!), I completely forgot about it as, due to its much slower CPU, I must have put it away somewhere in the attic many years ago :)
- sorokod 6y ago...slow and 32 bit. Got one too.
- pengaru 6y ago> ...slow and 32 bit. Got one too. Slow by modern standards, being pre-Nehalem, yes. But not 32-bit, the X61s tops out at a 1.8Ghz c2d L7700, which is 64-bit: https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/32243/intel-core-2-duo-processor-l7700-4m-cache-1-80-ghz-800-mhz-fsb.html https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/32243/i... Intel® Turbo Boost Technology: No Intel® Hyper-Threading Technology: No Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x): Yes Intel® 64: Yes Instruction Set: 64-bit Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technology: Yes Intel® Demand Based Switching: No