3 ms·
So someone offers a job at a poor rate, and it's "exploitation". Then what are you and me, who didn't even offer a rate? If they would've literally starved wit
by Chris2048 6y ago
So someone offers a job at a poor rate, and it's "exploitation".
Then what are you and me, who didn't even offer a rate? If they would've literally starved without the offer, it literally saved their life.
If a persons situation is not made worse by a job offer, then what's the problem? They would've still been worse off without it.
- JulianTapales 6y agoJust because they would be better off with it doesn’t mean it’s not exploitative. The problem is the lack of non exploitative alternatives. You can argue a life of exploitation is better than starving to death but I’d say even that is up for debate.