2 ms·
"Changes in A have no effect on B, and vice versa" is a bit more cumbersome that "A is orthogonal to B".
by jjgreen 6y ago
"Changes in A have no effect on B, and vice versa" is a bit more cumbersome that "A is orthogonal to B".
- abhinav22 6y agoIsn’t it easier to say A is independent from B?
- a3n 6y agoExactly the same number of words.
- gostsamo 6y agoOrthogonal adds the idea that the two could be combined and achieve something more, a.k.a it would imply the use of the word "synergy" as well which might be even more exotic for the OP.
- jjgreen 6y agoOrthogonal also seems to me to be more symmetric, independence (for example in the political sense) need not be: Scotland gaining independence from the UK does not imply the converse in a natural sense.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]