3 ms·
I mean....radio was never a money maker for acts. It was to get their name out their to make money elsewhere. Just kinda how the market is setup. I don't think
by s0xTester 6y ago
I mean....radio was never a money maker for acts. It was to get their name out their to make money elsewhere.
Just kinda how the market is setup. I don't think it is unsustainable for artists.
I fucking hate "exposure", but that is literally what radio/streaming is is.
It is never a substantial revenue stream until you hit big.
And with today's tech, radio had to become streaming.
Paying a penny per stream is highly unsustainable for everyone.
What would you suggest to fix it?
I think the system is pretty decent all things considered. Now, Spotify could definitely be better at hyping and pushing new music/low creators....but other than that I don't think they're the enemy here.
- tgv 6y agoStreaming isn't comparable to radio. If a penny per stream is unsustainable, perhaps we better go back to just radio. Hyping new music isn't going to do shit about revenue.