The article by the BMJ is responding to the leak as if the information within it is believed to be correct. Is the EMA suggesting that this isn't the case or a

The article by the BMJ is responding to the leak as if the information within it is believed to be correct. Is the EMA suggesting that this isn't the case or are they just telling us that it was editorialised by whoever disseminated it? Doctored is the word you'd use if the contents have been changed in order to deceive people. However this could be an attempt at damage control if they want people to dispute the veracity of the leak. Edit: Since I'm questioning the EMA here I'll add that "Vaccines are Good" and that we should await expert opinion before making idle speculation.