3 ms·
What published data are you referring to? Because the event that's causing this is in no way within the statistical references most of the British media is pump
by libertine 6y ago
What published data are you referring to? Because the event that's causing this is in no way within the statistical references most of the British media is pumping out - which is what you're talking about when you say "blood cloths".
It's not "just blood cloths", it's the type of cloths, where they are located, with low pallet count, with more incidence on a younger age group, localized in an hospital staff.
- mytailorisrich 6y agoWell... Article published 40 minutes ago: The European Union medicines regulator has reiterated there is "no indication" that the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid jab causes blood clots, after several countries paused their rollouts. European Medicines Agency (EMA) head Emer Cooke said she remained "firmly convinced" that the benefits of the vaccine outweighed any risks. But even if the blood clots observed are in fact due to the vaccine the numbers are so small that it seems to me irresponsible to suspend vaccination and to publicise this so much. [1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56411561 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56411561
- libertine 6y agoAgain you keep referencing British media that it's clearly doing a bad job reporting this - if they are doing this on purpose that's to be discussed. The problem isn't the blood clots. That's the spin British media is giving to this, and that's what EMA is addressing.