Sure, you're perfectly right, this is a different point polarizing the discussions. There is a lot of misunderstandings around modalities (should/has to; is pos

Sure, you're perfectly right, this is a different point polarizing the discussions. There is a lot of misunderstandings around modalities (should/has to; is possible/is necessary) in common arguments: - substance is legal = there is a free access to the substance - you have right to protest = you can go around the city and do anything, as long you make a point - there is freedom of speech = you can speak anything you want without consequences