Came to say the same, and guile emacs was attempted in the past. It doesn't make sen to have multiple interpreters jury-rigged up (the horror!) And it also doe

Came to say the same, and guile emacs was attempted in the past. It doesn't make sen to have multiple interpreters jury-rigged up (the horror!) And it also doesn't make sense to throw away all the lisp by having no interpreter for emacs lisp. Guile does support emacs lisp just for this purpose.