Maybe I'm jaded from stories I've heard of academics behaving badly. Scientists have been sniping at each other inside and across their disciplines longer than

Maybe I'm jaded from stories I've heard of academics behaving badly. Scientists have been sniping at each other inside and across their disciplines longer than there's been science. I didn't assume he was any different and I don't know why anyone would. Maybe he capitalized on the brand a bit more than others, but I can't find a standard to hold him to. How can I say how I'd act in his shoes when I would fight to my last breath just to not be in his shoes? Maybe we do need "to judge" as the reviewer says, but I don't have the stomach for it. I guess it's "thanks and good job" to the people who do? The editor dropped the ball by not titling the review "Hawking Hawking Hawking". I also got a pop-over to subscribe, which puts us at "Hawking Hawking Hawking Hawking".