> I'm assuming that these decisions aren't political and are genuinely being taken for medical reasons. I mean, I sure hope so. Not that I agree with the decis

> I'm assuming that these decisions aren't political and are genuinely being taken for medical reasons. I mean, I sure hope so. Not that I agree with the decision, but it's more complicated. People have to trust the vaccines to actually take them. There is already the fear that the process has been rushed, and particularly with AstraZeneca, there are some trust issues. Again, I don't want to argue that the concerns themselves are founded, just that they exists. If that is the right measure to address those concerns is not purely medical or easily quantifiable. If you don't suspend it, would people still take the vaccine? Would they take the others? Personally, since that is the case, I think one should stick with the facts. Be transparent about it, and try not to preempt whatever people may think. I would take it without a moment of hesitation, if I would be offered the opportunity.