4 ms·
It would be interesting to have the article author run the lisp code on their machine for a real comparison - would be very interested to see the results. My ma
by gibsonf1 6y ago
It would be interesting to have the article author run the lisp code on their machine for a real comparison - would be very interested to see the results. My machine is a Linux (Ubuntu) laptop. I just sent an email to the author with the common lisp code - we'll se if he's interested enough to check.
- dexterlemmer 6y agoIt seems like he did. (Or may be someone else's. I didn't check the repo.) Common Lisp is the second slowest on his results table.