3 ms·
> It's 10x times better. Because it can fit 10x more data in the same storage budget. This makes no sense. It's 9% better because it's 9% better.
by saberience 6y ago
> It's 10x times better. Because it can fit 10x more data in the same storage budget.
This makes no sense. It's 9% better because it's 9% better.
- campital 6y agoThe resulting compressed archives of these operations are 10% and 1% of the original file sizes, respectively (10x difference). The percent reduction can’t really be compared linearly.