Of course all jurisdictions have an 'ultimate' goal of zero cases, using vaccines. But what I'm saying is that BC's health leadership has explicitly stated that

Of course all jurisdictions have an 'ultimate' goal of zero cases, using vaccines. But what I'm saying is that BC's health leadership has explicitly stated that their goal thus far has not been to drive cases to zero, and the reason is that it is not practical given imported cases. It could be done in the short term with a strict lockdown, and was in late spring 2020, but there would not be sufficient benefit to justify the cost of maintaining that policy, because as soon as restrictions were relaxed, cases would rebound. That's not the same as blaming the whole thing on US mismanagement. I agree that some people are doing that, and certainly I don't approve. (Although I wouldn't chalk it up to an 'inferiority complex'. If anything I would say too many people here are feeling a largely unjustified sense of superiority. Trump may have provided a very visual display of incompetence, but for the most part on the ground the responses were similar. And while Canada's results have been better than the US's, they've still lagged the world on average.) I do understand this policy though. It's convenient to think that if not for incompetent leadership we could be like NZ. But unlike an isolated island nation, it is not possible for a Canadian province to cut itself off from the rest of the world to a sufficient extent that a COVID-zero policy would have been practical thus far. Instead, the stated goal has been to control infections at a level where they did not overwhelm 1) the hospital system or 2) the ability to trace contacts. As the latter has been stressed over the winter, restrictions were increased.