3 ms·
From memory, published arguments have only been against right from the start, because it was so popular that the pro side needed no support. Comments and socia
by wyattpeak 6y ago
From memory, published arguments have only been against right from the start, because it was so popular that the pro side needed no support.
Comments and social sections were the big in-thing in the latter part of the noughties, if you were trying to make your site modern and hip, it was assumed you'd have comments and share links on everything. I recall a degree of belief that social media was the future and if you didn't integrate with it you'd get left behind, but I think as much it was just a design fad.
- dredmorbius 6y agoDoc Searls, Kevin Kelley, probably Clay Shirkey, various O'Reilly heads, Howard Rheingold, Stewart Brand, Esther Dyson, Declan McCullough, I recall or suspect, were among the boosters. I'm reading some late-1990s sources (Lawrence Lessig's Code, Andrew Shapiro's Control Revolution) which cover some of this ground. I was there for it myself, though memory is a faulty guide.. Online search is difficult as later writings cloud the results.