3 ms·
Based on the comment in the source, the hash table doesn't handle hash collisions. And furthermore, I don't see the code which benchmarks this versus other hash
by zucker42 6y ago
Based on the comment in the source, the hash table doesn't handle hash collisions. And furthermore, I don't see the code which benchmarks this versus other hash tables, just the claim that it is 2-3x faster. Specifically, comparisons for different tables sizes using the same hash function would be good.
The API this presents is not really inspiring either.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]