2 ms·

Right, art is only for the rich who can experience the original in person. My evil school with that art history textbook...

• foobar33333 6y ago
  No but getting an obvious replication is just a little weird. There is plenty of art of identical and higher quality than the famous pieces within affordable prices.
  • Rule35 6y ago
    You seriously think so? Or is that for the uncanny valley where it's obviously just a replica, but not just a poster? A lot of art, for many, is that others see the same thing through different eyes. Looking at the Mona Lisa or a Rembrandt, means that I'm experiencing what millions have but uniquely. Shared experiences create bonds, even across time and space. It's also perhaps a bit humbling in a way another similarly good painting from now wouldn't be because of the temporal distance it comes from.