4 ms·
I'm in Wisconsin, just got it, and am seeing 65-115 down, 15-40 up. I was hoping it would be better than Hughesnet, but I didn't expect it would be quite this g
by JasonFruit 6y ago
I'm in Wisconsin, just got it, and am seeing 65-115 down, 15-40 up. I was hoping it would be better than Hughesnet, but I didn't expect it would be quite this good. I did have about a five minute downtime yesterday. Not too shabby!
- SkyPuncher 6y agoWhat's your latency like? I'm in exurban Wisconsin. Speeds are fine, but Charter has terrible routing that pushes everything out to Minnesota before routing back down to Chicago. 40ms to 60ms latency on EVERYTHING.
- JasonFruit 6y agoIt's varied from as low as 30ms up to almost 80. Latency is just not going to be great with satellites, seeing that we're pushing it out to fricking space.
- brianwawok 6y agoExcept it’s low space. And signals travel faster in air than in glass. And the path is likely more direct. Just space alone isn’t enough to say the latency will be worse.
- m463 6y agoyes, just 341 miles. so 3.6 milliseconds raw speed-of-light round trip when overhead. I don't know what it would be like as it reaches the horizon, and how much latency each hop takes.
- alextheparrot 6y agoYou might be interested in https://youtu.be/m05abdGSOxY https://youtu.be/m05abdGSOxY, for some (long) routes it can theoretically be faster.