4 ms·
sh isn't a horror show, it's a POSIX standard and it's pretty easy to learn. Does systemd conform to any known standard? Of course not, they're making it up as
by Klwohu 6y ago
sh isn't a horror show, it's a POSIX standard and it's pretty easy to learn. Does systemd conform to any known standard? Of course not, they're making it up as they go. When's it going to be finished? Nobody knows. You simply can't rely on it.
- zaarn 6y agoThe core primitives of systemd units haven't changed in a long while. You can always rely on it being able to start your service and stop it. What might not work depending on what version of systemd you ship is additional parameters (such as requiring a path to exist outside mountpoints or setting resource limits).