3 ms·
FSD also mentioned/implied that driver assistance could be required, but did mention/omply that it should be good enough for someone to take a trip without inte
by omgwtfbyobbq 6y ago
FSD also mentioned/implied that driver assistance could be required, but did mention/omply that it should be good enough for someone to take a trip without intervention. Practically speaking it's just a larger feature set than EAP/AP.
Edit - Here's a link to the old FSD fine print. They say the system is designed to take trips with no input from the driver, but they don't guarantee that, which to implies FSD is just meant to be good level 2 driver assistance.
https://web.archive.org/web/20180806143159/https://www.tesla.com/models/design?redirect=no https://web.archive.org/web/20180806143159/https://www.tesla...
To be fair, Tesla could consider stuff like TACC to be level 3+ (no beta status, no disclaimer about always paying attention, etc), but it's definitely not level 4 because they require driver input and nag then disable without it.
The robotaxi/Tesla network idea was separate from EAP/AP and FSD and was only mentioned on the Tesla website for a short period of time with even more fine print/legalese (it was pie in the sky, which I imagine is why they took it down).
- camjohnson26 6y agoTo be clear I mean the term “Full Self Driving” as opposed to the product Tesla is selling.