3 ms·
I personally prefer primary/secondary anyway.
by pdxandi 6y ago
I personally prefer primary/secondary anyway.
- carlhjerpe 6y agoSo do I, but I wouldn't care enough to start a debate about it.
- pdxandi 6y agoIf you did care enough to debate about it, that's okay.
- easytiger 6y agoThat doesn't infer the same relationship of dependency, but infers a parallel independent relationship. Not the same thing.
- ec109685 6y agoPrimary / Replica.
- dkarras 6y agoThat's not either, slave is not always a "replica" of the master, only in some contexts. And a master does not even need a slave (like in the github case) - so git's master is not even like the master (who had slaves) that people are offended about.
- rvnx 6y agoIt's more similar to the meaning of audio master, like a reference copy, not that branches are slave of it.
- tedunangst 6y agoSo in a master slave database setup, the slave does all the work while the master supervises?
- ranguna 6y agoThat's... A really good argument.