4 ms·
I wonder if the USG would consider the shooting down of Starlink Satellites as an act of war after SpaceX refuses to comply with chinese regulations. It's prob
by Roritharr 6y ago
I wonder if the USG would consider the shooting down of Starlink Satellites as an act of war after SpaceX refuses to comply with chinese regulations.
It's probably all moot as China would probably simply halt Tesla Sales, as they are not bound by the logics of legality.
- postingawayonhn 6y agoI don't think anyone has the ability to shoot down enough Starlink satellites to make a difference. Musk's biggest risk in China is the CCP confiscating the Tesla factory in Shanghai.
- wcoenen 6y agoTurning one satellite into a cloud of debris would suffice, Kessler syndrome would do the rest.
- jiofih 6y agoWe are very very far from that happening. Even with most satellites being in the same torus around earth, if every single one in orbit right now were to instantly shatter, each piece would have something like a 1000sqkm volume to roam in.
- JasonFruit 6y ago*area
- jiofih 6y agoI meant km3 :)
- voldacar 6y agoDebris would deorbit rapidly, starlink satellites are relatively low-altitude.
- Demigod33 6y ago> I don't think anyone has the ability to shoot down enough Starlink satellites to make a difference. Not with rockets, but maybe with lasers? What damage can a single one do? Could a country deploy them at specific orbits to have enough coverage to destroy a sufficient amount?
- throwaway53453 6y agoThis is why the Space Force is unironically a great idea.
- martin8412 6y agoChina most probably have the resources for that if they want to
- TaylorAlexander 6y agoShooting down any satellites is extremely dangerous due to the orbital debris this would create. The US would take that act very seriously.
- jiofih 6y agoThere is no “airspace” controlled by countries in space, and the satellites are not geostationary, so they would have to shoot down everyone’s fleet.