You don’t know that was the issue. There may be other (more or equally valid) scientific data that contradicts the article, or there may be flaws in the analysi

You don’t know that was the issue. There may be other (more or equally valid) scientific data that contradicts the article, or there may be flaws in the analysis. Looking at the article, is about a computer model that somebody built - these are incredibly easy to (intentionally or unintentionally) bias, and I’d say that looking at this critically is entirely appropriate.