3 ms·
The key difference is AI curation. What you see here depends on what time things get posted and how many up-votes posts get. FB, twitter, et al, decide what to
by barbacoa 6y ago
The key difference is AI curation. What you see here depends on what time things get posted and how many up-votes posts get. FB, twitter, et al, decide what to show you based on what they think you will like using opaque complex software.
If a newspaper publishes a 'letter to the editor' that is libel they are liable because they chose it to publish. that's what the big tech social media do.
If section 230 got repealed it would have effects on sites like HN, but the would be catastrophic for big tech social media.
- RandallBrown 6y ago> What you see here depends on what time things get posted and how many up-votes posts get. Is that not a large part of how most social media algorithms work?
- berryjerry 6y agoIt appears sites regularly add or remove items from their trending lists, both by manual review as well algorithms which are essentially automated manual review by the person who wrote the algorithm. That kind of control is the same as a Newspaper determining what headlines you read and what stories get the most attention, basically controlling the conversation and making editorial decisions.
- bootlooped 6y agoThe collateral damage would be unacceptable. Goodbye any comment section, goodbye bulletin boards and forums; the damage may even extend to things like MMORPGs.