4 ms·
A crucial point of the article is that it's about the technology, not the particular implementation. So in your example, it would be EVs that need to go extinct
by tacitusarc 6y ago
A crucial point of the article is that it's about the technology, not the particular implementation. So in your example, it would be EVs that need to go extinct, not Tesla.
- dmitriid 6y agoIt might be both, because we could bend the definitions and what we consider tech or a gadget every which way :) Like punchcards and related technologies are probably dead, for all intents and purposes. But you could argue that the ideas and the resulting tech (computers and programming) behind them lives on.