2 ms·
Hmm, this looks very interesting! I've ended up preferring dplyr for it's expressiveness in spite of the speed difference, so this might be a nice compromise fo
by rcthompson 6y ago
Hmm, this looks very interesting! I've ended up preferring dplyr for it's expressiveness in spite of the speed difference, so this might be a nice compromise for when dplyr gets too slow.