2 ms·
There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the on
by morelisp 6y ago
There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.
- pjc50 6y agoYou're going to have to contextualise this.
- morelisp 6y agoCromwell was a monster reacting to a monstrous system. History is quick to pass judgement the former while ignoring - and in the case of England unlike France, perpetuating - the latter.
- ali_m 6y agoThis is from "A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court" by Mark Twain - here he's talking about the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution