3 ms·
Either I'm built different than other people (and so is the other commentator) or this is wrong. I used a blood glucose monitor to see how my body actually reac
by Daho0n 6y ago
Either I'm built different than other people (and so is the other commentator) or this is wrong. I used a blood glucose monitor to see how my body actually reacted to what I ate. Besides, even if true, it doesn't matter. What most people seem to misunderstand is that the body simply doesn't react the same in ketosis. On keto I could eat a meal and my insulin levels didn't change much, unlike off keto where it is s constant up and down no matter what I eat. In other words in ketosis the spike if I eat an apple is way less than if not in ketosis.
Edit since I can't reply to the reply:
>the idea that carbs = fat
That is the most stupid thing I have ever heard. No-one eating keto have ever said that or they would only eat candy.
And yes you can look it up but insulin level index is only like 1/10 of the story. The fact is still that if a vegan eat an apple the blood spike is higher than if someone in ketosis does. Higher spike = hungry faster, which is the whole point of keto. 1 calorie from non-fat != 1 calorie from fat.
- cageface 6y agoYou can look it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulin_index https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insulin_index Beef is above even white pasta. Your blood glucose and insulin levels are two different things. The healthiest populations in the world eat a lot of (untefined) carbs so the idea that carbs = fat is simple and appealing but also wrong.
- incrudible 6y agoA single number sampled after a two-hour period doesn't paint the whole picture. If you eat a bowl of rice this likely will happen: Your blood sugar spikes, insulin is released. If after a while your blood sugar is still elevated, another dose of insulin is released which can push your blood sugar below baseline and to the point where "hunger" is triggered. If you eat the caloric equivalent of that in the form of a steak, your blood sugar stays more or less constant. How exactly this plays out depends on your insulin sensitivity. It may be different for highly insulin sensitive people, but empirically it is true for me and probably for most people, otherwise "sugar crash" wouldn't be a word. Of course, you probably won't eat just a bowl of rice except for experiment, adding some fat and protein can greatly mitigate the effect. > The healthiest populations in the world eat a lot of (untefined) carbs so the idea that carbs = fat is simple and appealing but also wrong. The "healthiest" populations also are outliers in many other respects. I'm not making an argument that a high-fat diet is healthy or unhealthy. I'm saying that fat, protein and carbohydrates are quite different in how they are experienced from a dietary perspective, regardless of caloric equivalence.
- cageface 6y agoWhite rice maybe. Eat whole carbs like most humans have for most of human history and you will be fine.
- incrudible 6y agoWhat do you consider "whole carb" then? Whole grain bread or potatoes have a comparable or higher insulin index, and even if the glycemic index may be lower, the glycemic load is the same. Really what you need to do in order to avoid this effect is to add fat and protein into your meal. As for what "most humans ate for most of history", it's not really clear-cut. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene_human_diet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene_human_diet
- cageface 6y agoAdding protein is just making things worse. If you want to control glycemic response then what you want is more fiber: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3001740/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3001740/ Add some veggies to your meal.