5 ms·

> Considering that this is exactly what Musk did, I find it pretty ironic that his fans have no problem projecting that upon people that Musk smears. A bit ad

by xedeon 6y ago

> Considering that this is exactly what Musk did, I find it pretty ironic that his fans have no problem projecting that upon people that Musk smears. A bit ad hominem isn't it? How do you know I am a fan? Everything I said are facts from court documents. Unsworth was even hostile to actual rescuers/divers... Are they fans of Musk too? How do you address this statement by Unsworth: "I will make the divers sugger [sic] for leaving us out of the loop" I think it speaks volumes about what kind of person he is and his moral values. Trying to capitalize on a "high stakes situation" per your own words. He is not exactly the saint/hero you're claiming. Based on court documents. Not my own opinion.

heavyset_go 6y ago
Care to address any of my post? Because I don't intend to participate in furthering Musk's infantile smear campaign even if you want to. edit: It would be nice if you indicated that you edited your above post after I had replied to it. Thanks. edit: edit: Given that you edited your post, I will have to reply via edit. > A bit ad hominem isn't it? How do you know I am a fan You're aware that HN posts aren't deleted, right? I know because of your own posts[1]. Of 338 total comments, 140 of them are defending Tesla, which is what 41.42% of your total posts are about. For someone who claims they aren't a fan, you sure have a strange fixation with defending the company, even making it a significant chunk of your HN career. I implore anyone who thinks that's an "ad hominem" to point this out to click on this link[1]. [1] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=xedeon%20tesla&dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sort=byPopularity&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?query=xedeon%20tesla&dateRange=all&p...
- xedeon 6y ago
  I provided you with a collection of facts from the court case and ruling. Make of it what you will. But painting Unsworth as a saint that did nothing wrong and calling it a smear campaign is baseless. You are essentially discounting the judge/jury decision on this matter. If the facts were on Unsworth side. It would have been an ironclad case. I am operating from a factual standpoint. You seem to be on the emotional side because you keep going on this tirade.
- xedeon 6y ago
  > For someone who claims they aren't a fan, you sure have a strange fixation with defending the company, even making it a significant chunk of your HN career. I love how you keep steering the conversation away from facts and directing it towards me. How exactly are you providing value on this discussion? Also, hang on... There are people who actually consider HN as a "career"? How do I get compensated? I don't matter. Facts do. If you can correct me where I said something that is not factual on this thread. Please feel free to do so. > You're aware that HN posts aren't deleted, right? Of course! This is the internet after all. You're digging through my profile to make a point? Now that's what you call infantile. Why don't you address what I wrote with your counterarguments? You yourself seem to be on an emotional Tesla tirade [1]. Don't act all holier than thou. [1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&query=heavyset_go%20tesla&sort=byPopularity&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu... > I implore anyone who thinks that's an "ad hominem" to point this out to click on this link[1]. You just proved my point! What your doing is a sad attempt to rally the mob towards me. If people disagree, they can just downvote my comments. But I do try to be factual as best that I can.

by xedeon 6y ago

heavyset_go 6y ago

Care to address any of my post? Because I don't intend to participate in furthering Musk's infantile smear campaign even if you want to. edit: It would be nice if you indicated that you edited your above post after I had replied to it. Thanks. edit: edit: Given that you edited your post, I will have to reply via edit. > A bit ad hominem isn't it? How do you know I am a fan You're aware that HN posts aren't deleted, right? I know because of your own posts[1]. Of 338 total comments, 140 of them are defending Tesla, which is what 41.42% of your total posts are about. For someone who claims they aren't a fan, you sure have a strange fixation with defending the company, even making it a significant chunk of your HN career. I implore anyone who thinks that's an "ad hominem" to point this out to click on this link[1]. [1] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=xedeon%20tesla&dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sort=byPopularity&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?query=xedeon%20tesla&dateRange=all&p...

xedeon 6y ago
I provided you with a collection of facts from the court case and ruling. Make of it what you will. But painting Unsworth as a saint that did nothing wrong and calling it a smear campaign is baseless. You are essentially discounting the judge/jury decision on this matter. If the facts were on Unsworth side. It would have been an ironclad case. I am operating from a factual standpoint. You seem to be on the emotional side because you keep going on this tirade.
xedeon 6y ago
> For someone who claims they aren't a fan, you sure have a strange fixation with defending the company, even making it a significant chunk of your HN career. I love how you keep steering the conversation away from facts and directing it towards me. How exactly are you providing value on this discussion? Also, hang on... There are people who actually consider HN as a "career"? How do I get compensated? I don't matter. Facts do. If you can correct me where I said something that is not factual on this thread. Please feel free to do so. > You're aware that HN posts aren't deleted, right? Of course! This is the internet after all. You're digging through my profile to make a point? Now that's what you call infantile. Why don't you address what I wrote with your counterarguments? You yourself seem to be on an emotional Tesla tirade [1]. Don't act all holier than thou. [1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&query=heavyset_go%20tesla&sort=byPopularity&type=comment https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu... > I implore anyone who thinks that's an "ad hominem" to point this out to click on this link[1]. You just proved my point! What your doing is a sad attempt to rally the mob towards me. If people disagree, they can just downvote my comments. But I do try to be factual as best that I can.