3 ms·
It has already happened. Back in 2013, Xerox had a copier that changed numbers, for similar reasons. https://www.theregister.com/2013/08/06/xerox_copier_flaw_
by Baeocystin 6y ago
It has already happened. Back in 2013, Xerox had a copier that changed numbers, for similar reasons.
https://www.theregister.com/2013/08/06/xerox_copier_flaw_means_dodgy_numbers_and_dangerous_designs/ https://www.theregister.com/2013/08/06/xerox_copier_flaw_mea...
- Sebb767 6y agoThat was due to compression, however, not upscaling. Related, but not similar :)
- herendin2 6y agoUpscaling could be described as the decompression stage of a lossy compression algorithm
- Sebb767 6y agoA compression algorithm knows which data was lost and can optimize the discarded data for a good lost data/saved space ratio. Data "lost" by a low resolution sensor most definitely does not fit this description. Imagine saving a FullHD png instead of a 4k jpg - the former is most likely far worse. It's not too dissimilar, I agree, but there are differences.