> "messaging" is an abstract concept. It doesn't have rights We agree. No idea how I screwed up that sentence. The intent was "that messaging is the right core

> "messaging" is an abstract concept. It doesn't have rights We agree. No idea how I screwed up that sentence. The intent was "that messaging is the right core of OOP because", but it was awkward, and I spliced something together. > It's the kind of thing that two-bit politicians like to dig up on each other, to nobody's edification. This is a discussion of what a word means, not an attack on someone's character.