3 ms·
http://www.rollstonepigraphy.com/?p=896 http://www.rollstonepigraphy.com/?p=896 It could be real, could be fake. Theirs lots of evidence for it being fake whic
by throwawaygal7 6y ago
http://www.rollstonepigraphy.com/?p=896 http://www.rollstonepigraphy.com/?p=896
It could be real, could be fake. Theirs lots of evidence for it being fake which the new work doesnt adequately deal with.
If they are real, it poses problems for modern critical scholarship because the words for god are not sympathetic with modern theories and establishes a date for deuteronomy far earlier than modern critical scholarship supports.
On the other hand, they're very likely a forgery - the motivation for the forger would be to validate traditional dates for deuteronomy vs modern critical dates that are much earlier.