4 ms·
Actually, I don't think something like busybox included in systemd is necessarily bad. You could have a system recoverable even if everything else breaks. Of co
by marcodiego 6y ago
Actually, I don't think something like busybox included in systemd is necessarily bad. You could have a system recoverable even if everything else breaks. Of course, it would really enable systemd/linux.
- hexo 6y agoIt doesnt need to be included in systemd for that.
- toast0 6y agoShhhh. Don't give them ideas. Including busybox in the initrd or whatever it's called now is probably a good idea. Having systemd developers write a new interpretation of that, rehashing old bugs is not great.
- tyingq 6y agoMost of what you would need to cobble together a busybox like binary is there in the systemd/src/basic directory. stat-util, procfs-util, sort-util, path-util, and so on.
- anthk 6y agoOpenBSD has a ramdisk for that.