Right and there's nothing wrong with genuine questions - however each question is asking for the commenters time to satisfy your own curiosity and there is a th

Right and there's nothing wrong with genuine questions - however each question is asking for the commenters time to satisfy your own curiosity and there is a threshold where asking a bunch of loosely defined open ended questions no longer contributes value to a conversation (because they become rhetorical, unanswerable, or the commenter has moved on and doesn't want to commit to a full answer), etc. In short it gets to a point where it seems like you're only asking questions to prove someone else incorrect or even inferior - versus to actually further a conversation by contributing concrete evidence. This may not have been your intention, or I could be misinterpreting it, but in your shoes I would want someone to tell me they had this impression so I could consider it going forward.