> If the candidate is using a tech you’re unfamiliar with why are you interviewing them? did you read the article? Did you see the comment I was replying to? T

> If the candidate is using a tech you’re unfamiliar with why are you interviewing them? did you read the article? Did you see the comment I was replying to? The gist is that a candidate may know other things that I don't and still successfully answers the technical question. Just because it wasn't using the tech I would have used to solve the problem doesn't mean they're unqualified. Not saying that's what you're saying, I'm just repeating explicitly what I only implied earlier.