3 ms·
You left out the part where Google changed their minds and decided to pay for news in Australia. The whole "Ok. We'll comply with the law, forgo those benefits
by leereeves 6y ago
You left out the part where Google changed their minds and decided to pay for news in Australia. The whole "Ok. We'll comply with the law, forgo those benefits and stop sending traffic." bit was an empty threat.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/17/business/media/australia-google-pay-for-news.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/17/business/media/australia-...
- WarOnPrivacy 6y agoGoogle's action did what it was intended to do, expose that the stated reason for the law (using content w/o compensation) was a lie.