3 ms·
Thanks. I can see the utility of having separate components do their "own" full lifecycle even if I usually do tend to approach it in other ways, it's a valid t
by hnedeotes 6y ago
Thanks.
I can see the utility of having separate components do their "own" full lifecycle even if I usually do tend to approach it in other ways, it's a valid take and can make sense (although as you said I think it can be done with SQL).
I agree with you on redis-like utilities being better for pure KV stores. If you resort to that sort of thing regularly and want to give another look into postgres you might want to give Elixir a try. It has first class support for postgres with Ecto, and you can use redis-like stores from the language itself, skipping serialization (a note is that, one of the valuable things in redis usually comes from being in a separate instance, many times managed automatically, and so almost being a permanent cache - to have exactly the same properties you would need to dig a bit deeper in Elixir, but still pretty doable with the language building blocks).