That article uses "tested positive" and "case" interchangeably, which conflicts with CDC's clinical definition of "case". These threads are rife with accusatio

That article uses "tested positive" and "case" interchangeably, which conflicts with CDC's clinical definition of "case". These threads are rife with accusations of gambling with lives, yet we can not by the numbers distinguish between an illness with symptoms and positive-testing infection. Are we sure these 5% and 4.5% are both as dangerous as each other? For all I know, they have measured different things.