3 ms·
That claim is much weaker. Didn't you say cancel culture isn't a very good term?
by pseudalopex 6y ago
That claim is much weaker.
Didn't you say cancel culture isn't a very good term?
- throwaway894345 6y ago"cancel culture" isn't a very good term because it can encompass different things, but I've established several times in this thread what I mean by it: harassment campaigns for the express purpose of having an employee terminated because they caused offense. I don't understand why you say this claim is weaker (weaker than what?).
- pseudalopex 6y agoYou claimed previously anyone can harass your employer into firing you if you offend them. The new claim is weaker. Cancel culture is also a bad term because it isn't a culture.
- throwaway894345 6y agoAnyone can harass your employer into firing you if you offend them because we have at-will employment (or more precisely, because we don't legally protect one's employment from cancel culture). Those aren't rival claims... > Cancel culture is also a bad term because it isn't a culture. No argument here, but I'm going to keep using it for lack of a more precise, widely-agreed-upon term.