4 ms·
1. Technically - yes. Although if we go to discuss this further we would go over this technicality. 2. That was clearly stated and discussed in depth in the be
by tseoeo 6y ago
1. Technically - yes. Although if we go to discuss this further we would go over this technicality.
2. That was clearly stated and discussed in depth in the beginning when I was joining. And yes - I am treating a lifestyle business as a growth potential business and that's what was clearly agreed from the beginning. He is having some difficulties with transitioning from this and thus I am trying to help him, not break him.
- travisjungroth 6y agoOn point 1, just expect to have this conversation pretty frequently. It is not a technicality. If you tell people that you are a startup founder and it comes out that you're recently taking on partner level responsibilities of a 7 year old company, they're very likely to see these things as in conflict. You said you've "always helped a bit". If by "always" you mean since year 0, that's at least a little more compelling.
- tseoeo 6y agoIt is something that I have on top of my mind but even for the technicalities: - we are moving things to a brand new company now - there will be a new brand soon, old one would be left just for the domestic market (a very small percentage of expected sales) - working on new products, 80% of old ones would gradually be stopped So I guess we are joining forces to create something new but in a step by step way so we can make bootstrapping it easier.
- travisjungroth 6y agoOh yeah, that's very different. That sounds a lot like founding and I didn't get it from your original post. May help to talk in terms of "refounding".