> If that's true it's hard to understand why the majority of the press was publishing information opposite to the state of the climate research at the time. Th

> If that's true it's hard to understand why the majority of the press was publishing information opposite to the state of the climate research at the time. Those stories do have a kernel of truth, as there does appear to have been a cooling trend at the time; it sort of comes down to the difference between "What if this trend continues?" and "This trend is likely to continue and here are the consequences". At least in the sampling of news stories in the paper I linked earlier, the quoted scientists seem to lean more towards "we need more data" and/or a more long-term warming trend, if they offered a long-term prediction at all.