3 ms·
Having searched, i found this article, which is far better written: https://www.vox.com/2021/3/8/22319503/supreme-courts-evangelical-campus-uzuegbunam-preczewsk
by ehutch79 6y ago
Having searched, i found this article, which is far better written: https://www.vox.com/2021/3/8/22319503/supreme-courts-evangelical-campus-uzuegbunam-preczewski-clarence-thomas-john-roberts https://www.vox.com/2021/3/8/22319503/supreme-courts-evangel...
It seems like, yes, his first amendment right were violated. While I may not like religion, he certainly should be allowed to hand out pamphlets as long as he's not being agressive about it.
- nelsonmandela 6y agoI don't get the $1 part They got to abuse his constitutional rights and they pay his attorneys fees + $1 as recompense?
- haneefmubarak 6y agoOften when someone wants to make a point on what they feel are their principles, they seek costs + $1 in symbolic damages, as the intended purpose is to set a precedent and not to actually collect punitive damages.