4 ms·
“Mr. Clean” in San Francisco Was Paid $380k per Year – It Wasn’t Enough
- disgrunt 6y agodang, why was this submission hidden? I didn't see it flagged, it just disappeared and there was no discussion link.
- PhantomGremlin 6y agoFWIW at 5:40 PM PST it's not hidden in any way. It has 63 upvotes. It appears as item #55. It has one comment other than yours.
- akhilcacharya 6y agoThe corruption is terrible and I'm glad he was caught and prosecuted but it's weird to me that the topline salary figure is so prominent. He oversaw a $500 million budget and made the equivalent of a Googler with 3 to 6 years experience? Or a Citadel Securities/Jane Street/Hudson River Trading engineer with 0-2 years of experience? That part is hardly salacious.
- stmfreak 6y agoBecause being paid $300k to pick up poop seems a bit high. Like $250k too high.
- csense 6y agoI fell for the clickbait. I was super excited to read a story about the actor who plays the mascot for the Proctor & Gamble cleaning product having to beg for a raise, because they were paying him only $380k (which I'm pretty sure is below the poverty line in San Francisco). Instead, "Mr. Clean" is merely the name of a corrupt (allegedly) local politician. How boring.
- evansj 6y agoThis website tried to add something to my calendar (iOS)