3 ms·
It is being argued that was not constitutional You can check this for more info: https://melissacrouch.com/2021/02/07/the-illegality-of-myanmars-coup/ https://
by kyawzazaw 6y ago
It is being argued that was not constitutional
You can check this for more info: https://melissacrouch.com/2021/02/07/the-illegality-of-myanmars-coup/ https://melissacrouch.com/2021/02/07/the-illegality-of-myanm...
That professor is an expert on the constitution.
- vmception 6y agothanks, is there an authority or arbiter in that country left that people can respect, or does it now require external intervention
- jessaustin 6y ago...or... It's entirely possible for there to be no such authority in place, without requiring "external intervention". In that case the people who live there might create such an authority, or they might not. Eventually we might realize how all humans are harmed by subjugation to authority.
- kyawzazaw 6y agocan you explain what you mean? There is an elected representatives that have the people's support.
- vmception 6y agoA Supreme Court to clear it up, a court that people respect. A branch of the government thinks its actions are constitutional, the people and the elected representatives don't. Just because we are conditioned to favor outcomes that are more inclusive and democratic, doesn't mean it is the legally compliant option. Just because a scholar and constitutional expert has an argument, doesn't mean it is the only interpretation. So is there a court that can take the arguments from the scholar on behalf of the people, and the arguments from the military, and make a ruling?
- ecnerwala 6y ago"So is there a court that can take the arguments from the scholar on behalf of the people, and the arguments from the military, and make a ruling?" NO. They wouldn't be in the current situation if they had strong functioning independent institutions.
- kyawzazaw 6y agoNo. The Supreme Court judges have been replaced by the military. There are no strong independent institutions.