5 ms·

Can we please start regulating crypto currency mining? This is insane. I think it needs to be global mining regulation. Can the UN do anything else? If we start

Can we please start regulating crypto currency mining? This is insane. I think it needs to be global mining regulation. Can the UN do anything else? If we start taking all the energy used to mine a given cryptocurrency it aggregates to more than most countries per cryptocurrency. Not ok. I know this is controversial but we have to at least debate this subject as we face an existential threat from climate change and yes cryptocurrencies are contributing to the climate crisis.

krapp 6y ago
The entire purpose of cryptocurrencies that they and their economies cannot be regulated by any government. A regulated cryptocurrency is just fiat with more steps and a contradiction in terms.
- blondie9x 6y ago
  What about mining? We regulate gold / silver mining. Why not crypto mining? It consumes more energy than the gold or silver mining industries. https://coincentral.com/bitcoin-mining-trumps-gold-mining-energy-consumption-estimates/ https://coincentral.com/bitcoin-mining-trumps-gold-mining-en...
  - krapp 6y ago
    That's not going to stop organized crime or states that want to leverage influence over Bitcoin. Regulating the mining of physical materials is easier because governments can directly control the mines and regulate shipping and industries, etc. But even then, mining is full of cartels, slavery and blood money. Unfortunately, I think the only thing that's going to stop Bitcoin mining is the laws of physics.
ArkanExplorer 6y ago
You regulate the fiat onroads. If miners cannot sell their coins, they can't pay the electricity bills. Bitcoin will always be around, but with sufficient fiat blockages the value plummets. Governments should announce that people will have a year to sell all their coins (the price will tank immediately anyway), and then buying and selling of PoW coins will be banned.
- fredfoobar 6y ago
  If you think "lack of electricity" is going to stop bitcoin mining, you are mistaken. You are just hoping for doom on an asset you don't understand or don't like, it's just not a good way to argue against something.
fredfoobar 6y ago
Do you have any reason to feel so despondent without any real evidence? There's already plenty of people mining with renewable/stranded energy sources, all mining will head this way. My prediction is that the "energy consumption" arguments against bitcoin will disappear in 5 years. People are gonna tell us (bitcoiners) that the USD is secured by the powerful military of US behind it and we're supposed to accept it as a positive, but if we say that we're going to use electricity to secure the network with nothing but math and computation, we're instantly hated by the same people. What gives? How can you be ok with wars and threats of violence to enforce the value of a currency, but not computation and electricity? I just don't understand it.
- blondie9x 6y ago
  Think about it like this new energy capacity is added that is sustainable but the cryptocurrency mining part of grid keeps consuming and eating more of the grid then newly added renewable capacity it would be a wash and we wouldn't achieve sustainability commitments and be able to mitigate climate change. You can't just say well if Bitcoin mining is renewable then we are ok. What about the rest of the grid? They need some of the newly added renewable capacity as well as growth continues. TLDR if new renewable capacity added is less than growth of mining and current use of mining we get no where.
  - fredfoobar 6y ago
    * You are talking as if there is a linear scaling of how much energy is consumed by a "miner" on the fly. This is false. * Most renewable/stranded energy mining operations have their own energy source that is not going to be shared by someone else. * Bitcoin's energy consumption doesn't scale with the number of transactions on each block. * Most of the bitcoin has already been mined, the incentive to "mine aggressively" is decreasing over time. * "What if bitcoin uses all the energy", like the top poster on this thread was talking about, they were mocking it to say that all of the energy generated by the sun will be used for mining eventually, is this a fair argument? If such extremist thinking took hold, we could use it to subdue pretty much all progress. Did we think that there will be gold miners digging up land everywhere and we won't have a place to live?
pinoli 6y ago
I would like to ask you why start with cryptocurrencies, that only account for 0.6% of world energy consumption, when we can dream big and tackle the issue once and for all by banning air travel. BOOM! In a heartbeat you are consuming -20% of world energy. Or why don't we ban actual mining? Another 10% plus reduction of unspeakable crimes perpetrated daily on vulnerable people. Why cryptocurrencies of all the energy hungry sectors? There are way lower hanging fruits than crypto.
- anoncake 6y ago
  The difference is that air travel is at least useful.
GlassOwAter 6y ago
Why don’t you start looking into how much energy is consumed by worthless things like christmas lights.
noch 6y ago
> we have to at least debate this subject as we face an existential threat from climate change and yes cryptocurrencies are contributing to the climate crisis. Are you Kim Stanley Robinson? If you aren't you'll enjoy his latest novel "Ministry for the Future", which follows the line you describe and posits a post-apocalyptic future with less machine labour and more manual labour, abandonment of air travel, no meat consumption by humans, a solar array covering much of India, etc. He then proposes replacing Proof of Work with Proof of Carbon Sequestration. --- Aside: MftF is, to me, an appalling unscientific low effort bit of propaganda (at least for the first 60 chapters) but perhaps there is a way to steelman KSR's theses.

krapp 6y ago

The entire purpose of cryptocurrencies that they and their economies cannot be regulated by any government. A regulated cryptocurrency is just fiat with more steps and a contradiction in terms.

blondie9x 6y ago
What about mining? We regulate gold / silver mining. Why not crypto mining? It consumes more energy than the gold or silver mining industries. https://coincentral.com/bitcoin-mining-trumps-gold-mining-energy-consumption-estimates/ https://coincentral.com/bitcoin-mining-trumps-gold-mining-en...
- krapp 6y ago
  That's not going to stop organized crime or states that want to leverage influence over Bitcoin. Regulating the mining of physical materials is easier because governments can directly control the mines and regulate shipping and industries, etc. But even then, mining is full of cartels, slavery and blood money. Unfortunately, I think the only thing that's going to stop Bitcoin mining is the laws of physics.

ArkanExplorer 6y ago

You regulate the fiat onroads. If miners cannot sell their coins, they can't pay the electricity bills. Bitcoin will always be around, but with sufficient fiat blockages the value plummets. Governments should announce that people will have a year to sell all their coins (the price will tank immediately anyway), and then buying and selling of PoW coins will be banned.

fredfoobar 6y ago
If you think "lack of electricity" is going to stop bitcoin mining, you are mistaken. You are just hoping for doom on an asset you don't understand or don't like, it's just not a good way to argue against something.

fredfoobar 6y ago

Do you have any reason to feel so despondent without any real evidence? There's already plenty of people mining with renewable/stranded energy sources, all mining will head this way. My prediction is that the "energy consumption" arguments against bitcoin will disappear in 5 years. People are gonna tell us (bitcoiners) that the USD is secured by the powerful military of US behind it and we're supposed to accept it as a positive, but if we say that we're going to use electricity to secure the network with nothing but math and computation, we're instantly hated by the same people. What gives? How can you be ok with wars and threats of violence to enforce the value of a currency, but not computation and electricity? I just don't understand it.

blondie9x 6y ago
Think about it like this new energy capacity is added that is sustainable but the cryptocurrency mining part of grid keeps consuming and eating more of the grid then newly added renewable capacity it would be a wash and we wouldn't achieve sustainability commitments and be able to mitigate climate change. You can't just say well if Bitcoin mining is renewable then we are ok. What about the rest of the grid? They need some of the newly added renewable capacity as well as growth continues. TLDR if new renewable capacity added is less than growth of mining and current use of mining we get no where.
- fredfoobar 6y ago
  * You are talking as if there is a linear scaling of how much energy is consumed by a "miner" on the fly. This is false. * Most renewable/stranded energy mining operations have their own energy source that is not going to be shared by someone else. * Bitcoin's energy consumption doesn't scale with the number of transactions on each block. * Most of the bitcoin has already been mined, the incentive to "mine aggressively" is decreasing over time. * "What if bitcoin uses all the energy", like the top poster on this thread was talking about, they were mocking it to say that all of the energy generated by the sun will be used for mining eventually, is this a fair argument? If such extremist thinking took hold, we could use it to subdue pretty much all progress. Did we think that there will be gold miners digging up land everywhere and we won't have a place to live?

pinoli 6y ago

I would like to ask you why start with cryptocurrencies, that only account for 0.6% of world energy consumption, when we can dream big and tackle the issue once and for all by banning air travel. BOOM! In a heartbeat you are consuming -20% of world energy. Or why don't we ban actual mining? Another 10% plus reduction of unspeakable crimes perpetrated daily on vulnerable people. Why cryptocurrencies of all the energy hungry sectors? There are way lower hanging fruits than crypto.

anoncake 6y ago
The difference is that air travel is at least useful.

GlassOwAter 6y ago

Why don’t you start looking into how much energy is consumed by worthless things like christmas lights.

noch 6y ago

> we have to at least debate this subject as we face an existential threat from climate change and yes cryptocurrencies are contributing to the climate crisis. Are you Kim Stanley Robinson? If you aren't you'll enjoy his latest novel "Ministry for the Future", which follows the line you describe and posits a post-apocalyptic future with less machine labour and more manual labour, abandonment of air travel, no meat consumption by humans, a solar array covering much of India, etc. He then proposes replacing Proof of Work with Proof of Carbon Sequestration. --- Aside: MftF is, to me, an appalling unscientific low effort bit of propaganda (at least for the first 60 chapters) but perhaps there is a way to steelman KSR's theses.