He claims Weimar Germany is an example of failed hate speech laws, but that's a weird claim, since they didn't enforce them (certainly not against Nazis). Then

He claims Weimar Germany is an example of failed hate speech laws, but that's a weird claim, since they didn't enforce them (certainly not against Nazis). Then he has an impassioned section where he claims the hate speech laws from '45 failed. The laws that date back to denazification! But he writes them off, with an exclamation mark, as an utter failure since some people in Germany, 75 years later support the far right. That rather moves the goal posts.