4 ms·
The claim isn't that Telegram's encryption is worse, it's that Telegram's closed-source backend is unauditable. Your other points are a great example of FUD.
by kissickas 6y ago
The claim isn't that Telegram's encryption is worse, it's that Telegram's closed-source backend is unauditable.
Your other points are a great example of FUD.
edit: changed clients to backend
- zwog 6y agoI think Telegram clients are open source, aren't they?
- kissickas 6y agoYou're right, edited. Thanks!
- wtmt 6y agoFor all practical purposes, Signal's backend is also closed source. The public repository for the server code hasn't been updated since April 2020 (nearing a year now) though Signal has, in the meantime, come up with features like new groups that necessitate storing more metadata on its servers.