3 ms·
Note that there are many other implementations of this type of click tracking, so it wouldn't be possible to strip all of these tracking strings. For example Re
by jannes 15y ago
Note that there are many other implementations of this type of click tracking, so it wouldn't be possible to strip all of these tracking strings. For example ReadWriteWeb also does this for posts on HN. Just take a look at this recent submission:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2643515 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2643515
The link contains this URL fragment: #.TfMwNJgETxs;hackernews
I think it's bad design to not assume that people can and will always share URLs with others. Putting tracking strings in URLs ignores this fact.
I often see Urchin URL parameters even on submissions on Hacker News. Most of the time they say utm_source=feedburner, which means that they were taken from an RSS reader. Just think about how easily such a submission reaching the top of Hacker News would distort the statistics.
Doesn't this make the the statistics almost worthless? Or at least harder to interpret? I think so.
- sbarre 15y agoI disagree, I think there is still value in knowing where the link originally came from (the one that was posted to Hacker News), even if you get lots of secondary traffic. Using referrer logs you can probably differentiate between "real" views from RSS and the ones that were propagated by a re-posting of that link.