We most certainly agree, friend :) I should have been more clear, indeed, I find sending signals to the system using the `ctrl` good and proper. I have no prob

We most certainly agree, friend :) I should have been more clear, indeed, I find sending signals to the system using the `ctrl` good and proper. I have no problem with the control key, sequences, or characters. My issue is ignoring the sheer, maddening, brilliance of the command key... > Then Linux desktop environments come along and say "well people really like Windows...we don't, but most people who might try our DE probably do, so let's borrow the bad ideas from Windows instead of the good ideas from Unix or MacOS. Let's use Ctrl+C for copy! But also the command line is kind of important on Linux, so let's screw everything up and use Ctrl+Shift+C for copy in the terminal only because who cares about usability and UX consistency? Not us!" Yes :jacknicholsonnoddingandsmiling: Linux and non-mac *nix systems emphasize how powerful the command line is but totally fucking ignore even the most fundamental of modern use case(s): copying and fucking pasting. It's just fucking silly. Yew (being a fancy terminal box thing) ain't that powerful if yew cain't (yeah, that's can't + ain't) copy and paste some shit. It's like someone bragging about how fast they can type with their feet, "...cool brometheus... how about you get a fucking job and pay rent for once?" shakes fist menacingly at the ether