But it also is as “visually noisy” as tailwind. So it fails at his first point. Also the tailwind is bloated is disingenuous given you just remove the unused c

But it also is as “visually noisy” as tailwind. So it fails at his first point. Also the tailwind is bloated is disingenuous given you just remove the unused classes as Pty of your build. Bad faith points all around, maybe except the obscure naming in tailwind. But alternatives like Hucssley solve this (name the properties the same as their css counterparts)